Page 42 - E&B_septemvri 2015 ENG.indd
P. 42
ECONOMY
Goran Petrevski
The author is Associate Professor at
the Faculty of Economics, “Ss. Cyril and
Methodius”University
What to Do?
We spent a quarter of The title of this article is borrowed So, we come to the key problem of the
a century, but we have from two well-known texts, Macedonian economy – simply said, the
not found the recipe. the novel written by Nikolay economic “engine” does not work! I don’t
Why? Because we were Chernyshevsky and the political know whether I should actually raise
constantly missing pamphlet of Vladimir Ilyich the question: What is the engine of the
the key problem – to Lenin. The direct motivation for writing economy? I am saying I don’t know whether
establish a functional this article are the numerous excellent this question is necessary, because the
market economy articles of few colleagues of mine, published answer is very simple – that is the market.
in the previous issues of this magazine, in As it usually happens, the answer to the
which they elaborate on various problems most difficult questions is usually very
Macedonian economy is facing. When simple. For twenty five years already we
reading these articles, one cannot deny that struggle to find the recipe for acceleration
lack of brave entrepreneurs, low quality of of the economic growth in Macedonia. And
education, inequality in income distribution we spent a quarter of a century, but we have
etc., truly represent serious obstacles that not found the recipe. Why? Because we
prevent the Macedonian economy from were constantly missing the key problem –
reaching the long-waited acceleration. At to establish a functional market economy.
the same time, however, when reading
these interesting articles, I cannot get rid As I have written in one of my previous
ofthe feeling that they address issues of articles, rather than installing this
secondary importance, whereas the main extraordinarily powerful engine (the
topic somehow always slips between the market), in the past two decades we
fingers. havehoped in vain that the state is the
one that canprovide bright future. In the
The main point of this article is that recent years, one may even notice that this
if you have a car the engine ofwhich has tendency to turn to the state interventionism
gone dead, you will accomplish nothing if is increasing more and more, and threatens
you waste time and energy for fixing the to becomeoverwhelming. History teaches us
brakes, light, or changing the battery. Truly, that prosperous are only those societies that
all these parts are vital for the good and managed to establish market economies
uninterrupted functioning of the car, but (free entrepreneurship plus competition).
that holds only if the main precondition is On the other hand, it is the same history
met – that the engine is OK. Conversely, if that taughtus (the former and current
the engine is not good, then fixing of these communist countries) a big lessonabout
parts will not at all move the car from where how societies in which the state plays the
it stands. Bottom-line: First you have to fix leading role in the economyend up.
the main problem (the engine) and then to
deal with the secondary issues. Actually, take a look at this obvious
“natural” experiment: let us compare the
42 September 2015

