Page 43 - E&B_septemvri 2015 ENG.indd
P. 43

In the focus                                                                                    ECONOMY

China was drowning                                                              never succeeded in establishing a market
in the mud until it                                                             economy, on the contrary, it has always
reached for the “magic                                                          searched for the solution in a centralized,
wand” – the market. It                                                          command economy in which there is no
is exactly the market                                                           competition and in which the authority (the
reforms (and not the                                                            tsar, the communist party or Putin) holds
cultural revolution of                                                          everything in its hands.
Mao) that are the main
driving force of the                                                               Here, some of you may say: OK, but there
Chinese economic boom.                                                          are contrasting examples, look at China. No,
When China allowed for                                                          the case of China only confirms my point.
entrepreneurs, stock                                                            That same China was drowning in the mud
exchanges, trade with                                                           until it reached for the “magic wand” – the
the world etc., it started                                                      market. It is exactly the market reforms
to grow with double digit                                                       (and not the cultural revolution of Mao) that
growth rates                                                                    are the main driving force of the Chinese
                                                                                economic boom. When China allowed for
                                development of USA and Russia in the last       entrepreneurs, stock exchanges, trade with
                                200 years. In 1815, Russia was big, strong      the world etc., it started to grow with double
                                (or, not so strong) empire, while USA was a     digit growth rates.
                                young state, like a baby trying to learn how
                                to walk. At that time Russia had semi-feudal       And truly, is this the obvious answer
                                economy, and 100 years later got stuck in       to the million dollar question – How to
                                the monstrous experiment with the buildup       get to a prosperous society? Of course, I
                                of communism. Opposite to this, from the        have no illusions that Macedonia is the
                                very beginning, USA chose the right path        same like USA, but that does not mean
                                – establishing a market economy, and step       that the benefits from the market are only
                                by step (but with big steps of seven miles) it  privilege for the large countries (just think
                                reached a level Russia can only dream about.    of the negative example of Slovenia, which
                                What can we infer from this “natural”           believed naively that guided by the “wisdom”
                                experiment? Imagine, 200 years ago America      of the state it can create a competitive
                                was a wilderness with almost no economy,        economy). When I am thinking about this
                                whereas Russia was a state with all the         issue, I just can’t explain to myself how
                                symbols. Using soccer terminology, at that      could we possibly be missing this simple
                                time Russia led by 10 to nothing. But, if you   truth? Actually, with this articleI have not
                                compare thesecountries today (or 50, 100        “discovered America”, because Adam Smith
                                years ago) what will be your conclusions?       wrote about the benefits from the marketby
                                That meager, almost non-existing American       the end of the 18th century! A large number
                                economy has turned into a giant, the largest    of my colleagues-economists, however,
                                economic power in the world.                    often fall in the following trap: whenever
                                                                                the economies get in bigger recessions,
                                    Why am I referring to this as a “natural”   preoccupied by the current economic
                                experiment in a sense used by Milton            difficulties, they look for a solution in a
                                Friedman? This example enables us to            larger state intervention, believing naively
                                isolate the factor that had a decisive          that it will solve the problems. The state can
                                influence on the end-result – the big           actually solve only the short-term, cyclical
                                difference between the two economies.           problems, but by limiting the market it
                                That factor is obvious – the market! In this    only undermines the long-term productive
                                example we have two big countries with big      capacity of the economy. At the end, “due” to
                                population and large natural resources, and     the sizable state intervention the economy
                                two countries that started from a different     loses its vitality and gets stuck in a long-
                                starting point (200 years ago Russia was by     term stagnation.
                                all means more advanced than USA). The
                                only (big and crucial) difference between the      I strongly believe that this is the key
                                two countries is in the fact that Russia has    problem of Macedonia: we fool ourselves
                                                                                if we expect that the state will provide

                                                                                September 2015                                  43
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48