Page 83 - Ekonomija i Biznis_May 2016.indd
P. 83

РУWБOРИRLКАD

reduced fivefold whereby the re-                 Figures           countries to experience signifi-
gion entered the crisis with very                                  cant shift of the human develop-
low levels of external debt, pro-       5.2%                       ment index as a reflection of the
viding more than enough space                                      improved conditions for life and
for fiscal and monetary expan-           the average growth IN     standard of living.
sion. When the crisis emerged in      LATIN AMERICA in the period
2008/2008, most of the central                                        Although it seemed that the
banks in the region reduced the                        2004-2008   region and especially the great-
interest rates, and the govern-                                    est economy in the continent,
ments increased the financial           6.2%                       Brazil, went through the cri-
spending. In addition, the coun-                                   sis quite well, still the positive
tries facilitated the access to           IS THE NON-EMPLOYMENT    movements were interrupted
new financing in terms of reduc-           in the Latin American   in 2014 when the total Latin
tion of the price of borrowing.                                    American economy increased
Such position of the monetary                  countries in 2013   by only 1.1%, and a fall of 0.5% is
and the fiscal policy in many                                      predicted for 2016. The poverty
countries of the region was un-         0.5%                       rates stagnate at the level from
imaginable previously.                                             2012, and probably this refers to
                                               FALL OF the total   the income distribution. How-
   What is the striking progress       economy of Latin America    ever, there are regional differ-
of the Latin American countries                                    ences within the continent. The
is actually the social progress:              ANTICIPATED IN 2016  unfavorable movements in this
the reduction of poverty, the im-                                  period are mostly a result of the
provement of the so called hu-                                     countries from the south of the
man development, the overall                                       continent, primarily the large
improvement of the condition                                       Brazil and Argentina, compared
of the labor markets and the                                       to the countries in the north,
change of the trend of the in-                                     such as Mexico, which deliver
come distribution. For a period                                    significantly better economic
of one decade, the unemploy-                                       results. The third group of coun-
ment halved: from 11.3% in 2003                                    tries – oil exporters, such as Ven-
to 6.2% in 2013. The rates of in-                                  ezuela, experienced significant
come inequality, primarily the                                     falls of their economies due to
Gini index, stagnated, there was                                   the low oil prices in the world
even a decrease in some coun-                                      market.
tries, which is also an important
progress, if one considers the                                        What is currently a bright
historically growing inequalities                                  spot for the Latin American
in these countries. Still, the level                               economies, are the low levels of
of income inequalities remains                                     external debt. Together with the
one of the highest in the word.                                    relative macroeconomic stabili-
Together with the solid growth,                                    ty, this provides access to rela-
these trends contributed for the                                   tively cheap external borrowing.
reduction of poverty rates, and                                    On the other hand, the govern-
an increase of the middle class.                                   ments and the central banks to a
In the period from 2003 to 2013                                    large extent used the space for
the average poverty rate in the                                    countercyclical monetary and
region reduced by striking 16                                      fiscal policy, which was their
points. In many countries, such                                    trump in the first years of the
as Uruguay there was a signifi-                                    impact of the crisis. A new crisis
cant progress in the access to                                     or unfavorable movements in
quality educational and health                                     these economies can make the
services, which contributed for                                    governments less responsive
many of the Latin American                                         and with less limited space to
                                                                   act.

                                                                   May 2016                             83
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88