Page 101 - Ekonomija i Biznis_May 2016.indd
P. 101

LITERATURE

  Robert Alagjozovski

The author is a literary critic
 and a PhD candidate(ABD)

   in Cultural Management

The lake travelled
to Europe

To the book of short stories “Everyone with their own lake” by Nenad Joldeski

This spring was a season of priz-              represented genres, including the collec-
                es. Last month we wrote about  tions of short stories against novels. This
                the prize Novel of the Year    means that the publisher that will chose
                of “Utrinski Vesnik” and the   the work of Nenad Joldevski automatically
                three young finalists. These   realizes two criteria for support. On the
days, exactly before the most import ant       other hand, I believe this was thought
literary event in this country, the Book       out, the invitation for support of trans-
Fair, we got some surprising news. The         lations is prolonged for the end of April,
young Nenad Joldeski (born in 1986) won        and the names of the awarded ones were
the prestigious European Union Prize for       announced much earlier than usual. In
Literature, for the collection of stories      this manner, Joldeski’s book has greater
“Everyone with their own lake”. This,          chances to immediately turn into one of
of course, is excellent news both for the      our most translated books from our coun-
young author and for the Macedonian lit-       try, and this could happen in only a year.
erature.                                       It is an excellent promotion of the Mace-
                                               donian literature, because once in three
   Namely, the EU Prize for Literature         years, a Macedonian author is the one in
is though out as a promotional asset for       the list of prize winners.
promotion of the literary careers of the
young authors. In this regard, one may            Maybe these facts do not have to be
say that is even excessive, same as many       known to the Commission that selected
other stimulating measures implemented         precisely this work. It probably had to
by the EU. Not only that the monetary          align its choice with the different criteria
prize is high, even the awarding of the        which always do not have purely aesthetic
prize and the series of other promotional      nature. However, certainly they are very
events have great media and PR coverage,       responsible for the selection. Let me point
but also the EU, within its Fund for Sup-      out, a bit paradoxically. The juries of this
port of Translations, pushes precisely the     European prize are national. Everyone
authors that received this prize. Accord-      chooses their author and work from their
ing to the former rules, the publisher that    own homes, and then this work gets a
will offer to translate a package of such      European “turbine”. This provides cred-
works had 25% higher chance to get the         ibility that they have a good insight in
grant, and from this year these chances        the national context, however I always
are reduced to, still high, 15%. Starting      ask how relevant they are to determine
from this year, the priority in the policy     the so called added European value that
of support are the so called insufficiently    these works should have. For this reason

                                               May 2016                                      101
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106