Page 17 - E&B_septemvri 2015 ENG.indd
P. 17

MEGA INTERVIEW

may have. Having in mind that society        market think tank which I created in
transformation may take different            Poland seven years ago. In democracy
shapes, what is the single most important    the ultimate battle is the communication
element on that endeavor? Looking back,      battle between the populists, free
what was the most important factor for       marketers, business sides, whether the
Poland’s successful transition?              country develops or not.

   L. Balcerowicz: I think to extend               What are the pillars of the Poland’s
the freedom, especially the economic         economic strategy for the future? How
freedom, so that many brave and              do you assess its competitiveness and the
entrepreneurial people can use their         sustainability of its economic growth in
talents and character. It is extremely       along run?
important. And, you create incentives
so that more people move to the                 L. Balcerowicz: This would depend
private sector and less to the public        on politics and politics in democracy
administration. So they are more             depends on the public opinion. Every
productive. And, it is advisable to do it    free country has various scenarios for
very fast if possible. If you have many      the future but only one of them will be
problems then comprehensive radical          implemented. I am trying with some
approach is usually better. I was very       other people to reduce the chances of bad
much for such an approach in Poland.         scenarios, which would be no reforms,
                                             and to increase the chances for reforms
       Where does Poland stand today?        scenario.
Poland is probably the most successful
economic story in Europe in the turbulent          One of the key concerns in Europe
times following the global financial crisis  is the youth unemployment. What do
in 2008. How do you explain this?            you think will prevail in the next decade,
                                             young Poles will leave the country looking
   L. Balcerowicz: First, at those times     for jobs, or there will be a reversed “brain
back, I entered with a team. As an           drain”?
academic I was interested in reforms as
a hobby. I have not foreseen that Poland        L. Balcerowicz: Depends on the gap
will become free during my lifetime, but I   in the per capita income. People tend to
had this hobby, I was interested in various  emigrate if they can have a better life and
reforms. And by chance, to be ready,         a high income. If you are poor country
more or less, when Poland becomes free       and you are free, you cannot stop it by
to launch radical reforms, rather fast and   administrative measures. So the only
comprehensive reforms. I think this was      way to reduce it over time is to grow
very important. Also in the Baltics. These   faster. This is why economic growth is so
are other examples of radical reformers.     extremely important. To create jobs in the
                                             private sector so that less people would
   Second, conservative monetary policy      move abroad. The poorer you are the
to bring stability of prices and stable      faster you have to grow. So, one cannot
banking sector. So, these are the main       overestimate the importance of a fast
reasons for Poland’s success. But, let me    economic growth for a poor country, it
stress that every country at some point in   is just impossible. This is by far the most
time needs more reforms, even the most       important national social goal. But, to
successful countries. And in Poland we       grow, you need continued good policies.
need more reforms, we have to increase       And, continued good policies need a lot
employment ratio, we have to improve         of fight within the society. Because, it is
the business climate for investment, we      easier to sell bad policies. Bad policies
have to increase the rate of growth of       are usually based on emotions and
productivity. And I am trying to shape       misunderstandings. For example, people
the Polish public opinion with a free

                                             September 2015                                17
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22